Two nice examples of complex cases, which in my view would be best tagged using the cycleway=lane tag *and* separate foot- and cycle-ways (both are at present not yet correctly tagged in OSM)
<http://mapillary.com/map/im/kRr5NPEzjLiwDsHWdAL-aw> mapillary.com/map/im/kRr5NPEzjLiwDsHWdAL-aw (from left to right in the picture:)) | oneway single lane road | one-way cycle lane (same direction) | segregated cycle-foot-way with one-way bicycle lane in the opposite direction | mapillary.com/map/im/6Ga2jVWZUd9TNFssCIAb-g (from left to right in the picture:) | separate side walk only for pedestrians (not visible) | oneway cycle lane tords the camera | two-lane road with opposite directions | separate cycle-foot-way with segregation | On 18 January 2018 at 22:02, Fernando Trebien <fernando.treb...@gmail.com> wrote: > "Note that a cycle track may alternatively be drawn as a separate way > next to the road which is tagged as highway=cycleway. Both methods > each have their pros and cons. While adding a single tag to an > existing way takes less time and still often describes the cycle track > accurately, a separately tagged cycle way is generally more flexible > and allows to capture more detail. When mapping a cycle track as its > own way, do not use any of the tags described below. " > > I think this means that, when trying to represent in OSM a road with a > parallel cycle track, if the track is mapped as a different line with > highway=cycleway, you should not add cycleway=* on the main road's > line. > > Or is it about a road with both a cycle lane AND a parallel cycle > track? If it is so, there would be no need to discuss pros and cons of > either method (tag on main way vs separate way), one should surely use > cycleway=lane on the main way and also map the parallel track as a > separate line. > > On Thu, Jan 18, 2018 at 3:30 PM, Dave F <davefoxfa...@btinternet.com> > wrote: > > You've either misread the paragraph or misused the asterisk. > > > > Roads can have a separate cycle path running parallel to it *and* a > > designated cycle lane in the road. > > > > DaveF > > > > > > On 16/01/2018 19:31, Fernando Trebien wrote: > >> > >> Second paragraph here: > >> https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:cycleway#Cycle_tracks > >> > >> On Tue, Jan 16, 2018 at 10:39 AM, Dave F <davefoxfa...@btinternet.com> > >> wrote: > >>> > >>> On 15/01/2018 14:47, Fernando Trebien wrote: > >>>> > >>>> The wiki also says that, when mapping a parallel cycleway as a > >>>> parallel line, one should not use the cycleway=* tag on the motorised > >>>> way > >>> > >>> > >>> For clarity, could you confirm which wiki page that is written. > >>> > >>> DaveF > >>> > >>> _______________________________________________ > >>> Tagging mailing list > >>> Tagging@openstreetmap.org > >>> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging > >> > >> > >> > > > > > > -- > Fernando Trebien > +55 (51) 9962-5409 > > "Nullius in verba." > > _______________________________________________ > Tagging mailing list > Tagging@openstreetmap.org > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging >
_______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
