I think it best to change the wiki beach front page.

At the moment only one method is mentioned ... and that is from the hi tide and away from the water. I think the other method - from the low tide and away from the water should be stated too.

 - On 04/04/18 20:58, Dave Swarthout wrote:
This is an interesting problem but it has no easy solution. Even if the Wiki definition was clear, unless you happen to be able to measure or otherwise determine the "mean high tide" line and other important characteristics, what we map as beach or tidal flat is purely an approximation, especially in areas having a large tidal range, as in Alaska where I do the bulk of my mapping (20-30 feet). Satellite imagery may offer a clear vision of beach and tidal flat but we cannot determine the height of the tide when the photo was obtained. Was it at high tide, low tide, or somewhere in between?

I agree that a beach is a place where wave action has created a relatively steep slope. Other areas closer to the sea are flatter and are often composed of finer particles, fine sand and clay, often referred to as mud. Indeed, much of Alaska's coastline could be characterized as mud_flat due to the large amount of solids Alaskan rivers transport to the ocean. In my hometown of Homer, Alaska, spring low tides can be so extreme that the water beyond the mud_flat is too distant to see. What you can see is mud, lots of it.

Taginfo tells us that neither mud_flat or tidal_flat (or variations without the underscore separator) are much in use, however, for some of my mapping I've used the combination
natural=wetland
wetland=tidalflat (but it could just as easily be wetland=mudflat)

I've drawn those areas the best I can based on convenient satellite imagery knowing full well it's merely a rough approximation. There may not be a better solution.

Cheers,
Dave

On Wed, Apr 4, 2018 at 4:53 PM, Warin <61sundow...@gmail.com <mailto:61sundow...@gmail.com>> wrote:

    On 04/04/18 18:18, Christoph Hormann wrote:

        On Wednesday 04 April 2018, Warin wrote:

            So a 'beach' may include a 'tidal flat' ... confused.

        I tried to explain the difference - a beach is primarily
        shaped by waves
        while a tidal flat is shaped by tidal currents.

        The domination of waves can usually be seen in the form of a
        smooth
        surface where structures (like waves in the slope) typically form
        parallel to the shore.  Like here:

        https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:The_beach_11111.JPG
        <https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:The_beach_11111.JPG>

        On tidal flats OTOH the water flow often form small or large
        channels
        like here:

        
https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Waikaraka_Cycleway_from_Mangere_Bridge_IV.jpg
        
<https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Waikaraka_Cycleway_from_Mangere_Bridge_IV.jpg>

        Beaches can only form from relatively coarse material (sand or
        coarser) - fine silt cannot form beaches because it does not
        settle
        fast enough in the fast moving water so the beach would
        quickly erode
        away.  Tidal flats can form both from fine silt and coarse sand.

        At coasts with a significant tidal range (like in the UK)
        there is often
        a beach in the upper part of the tidal range with a steeper
        slope and
        coarse sand and a tidal flat with less slope with either sand
        as well
        or finer material.

        Example:

        
https://mc.bbbike.org/mc/?lon=-4.390229&lat=51.716636&zoom=14&num=3&mt0=bing-satellite&mt1=mapnik&mt2=google-satellite
        
<https://mc.bbbike.org/mc/?lon=-4.390229&lat=51.716636&zoom=14&num=3&mt0=bing-satellite&mt1=mapnik&mt2=google-satellite>


    That is a very nice example, thanks .... I'd call them 'mud flats'
    ... :)

    Broome, Western Australia has tides of ~10 meters  and is know for
    the 'Staircase to the Moon Festival'
    where the moon is reflected off the beach/tidal flats ripples to
    form a stair case up to the moon, very pretty ...
    But I'm not certain if that is a tidal flat area or not ... the
    imagery does not revel it ..

    
https://mc.bbbike.org/mc/?lon=-4.390229&lat=51.716636&zoom=14&num=3&mt0=bing-satellite&mt1=mapnik&mt2=google-satellite
    
<https://mc.bbbike.org/mc/?lon=-4.390229&lat=51.716636&zoom=14&num=3&mt0=bing-satellite&mt1=mapnik&mt2=google-satellite>

    Arrr the visitors centre says tidal flats ..
    http://www.visitbroome.com.au/discover/facts-figures/staircase-to-the-moon
    <http://www.visitbroome.com.au/discover/facts-figures/staircase-to-the-moon>
    There are better photos of the staircase ..
    http://jksj.org/2015/06/10/broome/
    <http://jksj.org/2015/06/10/broome/>

    I'd still map the sand area as the beach as seen in the imagery,
    think the 'tidal flat' would have one edge as the beach edge and
    the rest be further out to sea.





    _______________________________________________
    Tagging mailing list
    Tagging@openstreetmap.org <mailto:Tagging@openstreetmap.org>
    https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
    <https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging>




--
Dave Swarthout
Homer, Alaska
Chiang Mai, Thailand
Travel Blog at http://dswarthout.blogspot.com


_______________________________________________
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging


_______________________________________________
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging

Reply via email to