The tagging as you described is correct. An alternative is to use simply cycleway=lane
or cycleway:left=lane cycleway:right=lane if you want to be explicit about that there are lanes on both sides of the street. I venture to say that any data consumer that processes bicycle-data will assume that a cycle lane is a oneway in the same direction as the motorized traffic if nothing is specified and the road itself is not a oneway. So, whether to explicitly tag that the lanes are oneways or not will probably not make a big difference. On 09/05/2018 19:11, Volker Schmidt wrote: > > I want to tag a road (one of thousands in this country) that has two > lanes for carsĀ (one in each direction) and two cycle lanes, one on each > side. Thes cycle lanes are by law one-way in the same direction of the > motorized traffic in the neighbouring road lane. > > My (basic) tagging would be: > highway=unclassified (or whatever) > cycleway:right=lane > cycleway:right:oneway=yes > cycleway:left=lane > cycleway:left:oneway=-1 > > the value "-1" is discouraged for the "oneway" key, but in this case I > see no alternative > "cycleway:left:oneway=-1" has some 800 uses in taginfo, > "cycleway:right:oneway=yes" has some 2800 uses in taginfo. > > Should I go ahead with my tagging? Alternatives? > > > > _______________________________________________ > Tagging mailing list > Tagging@openstreetmap.org > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging > _______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging