It will probably depend on traffic code/law in each country. According to wikipedia [1] it's normally between 2.5 and 3.5 m AFAIK when a lane is smaller, and thus not suitable for trucks and cars with caravans, it has to be indicated by a traffic sign. For me full width means that a car (which has to be smaller than 2 m, not ?) can drive over it, without blocking cars in other lanes.
[1] https://nl.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rijstrook p.s. this discussion should have been taking to a different thread, as we are now hijacking the OP's tread on "tagging of one-way cycle lanes". On Fri, May 11, 2018 at 9:55 AM, Martin Koppenhoefer <dieterdre...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > sent from a phone > >> On 11. May 2018, at 06:44, Marc Gemis <marc.ge...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> When the "lanes" tag was introduced the community choose to only count the >> "full width segments for motorised traffic". > > > what is the definition for “full width”? Is a road with 1,8 width lanes=0? > width=2.4? Given that maximum vehicle width is 2,50 it would seem sane to > assume full width to be at least 3,00 m. > > Ciao, Martin > _______________________________________________ > Tagging mailing list > Tagging@openstreetmap.org > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging _______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging