Back to this again, Paul. It is getting tiresome. If you don't like how the tag is defined, create a new one. Don't vandalize the old one.
The *:lanes suffix is unrelated to the lanes=* tag. Get over it. On Sun, May 13, 2018 at 8:26 PM, Paul Johnson <ba...@ursamundi.org> wrote: > On Sun, May 13, 2018 at 1:23 PM, Marc Gemis <marc.ge...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> On Sat, May 12, 2018 at 11:34 PM, Marc Gemis <marc.ge...@gmail.com> >> wrote: >> > For your first image lanes=0, lanes:forward=2, lanes:backward=1. >> Awkward but >> > correct. >> >> >> This is of course incorrect, lanes = 0 (or just do not mention it) >> and bicycle:lanes:forward=yes|yes (or designated|designated) and >> something similar for backward. > > > How can there be any bicycle lanes if there are no lanes? It literally > doesn't add up. > > _______________________________________________ > Tagging mailing list > Tagging@openstreetmap.org > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging > >
_______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
