On Sunday 27 May 2018, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote: > > > > And natural=grassland + natural:secondary=wood would > > be a grassland with scattered trees. > > I like the concept but would use landcover:secondary for the key. > Some natural values are describing or implying landcover but many do > not.
The concept is actually completely key agnostic. You could for example also use it for urban landuse - like a residential area with also a few shops using landuse=residential and landuse:secondary=retail. So not a good opportunity to piggy-back your landcover ideas to. ;-) -- Christoph Hormann http://www.imagico.de/ _______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
