Don't really have a strong opinion on it either way, just to raise a point for discussion... but if it's for emergencies, should it have some tag in the emergency=* namespace?
> -----Original Message----- > From: Jyri-Petteri Paloposki <jyri-petteri.palopo...@iki.fi> > Sent: Tuesday, 26 June 2018 00:56 > To: 'Tag discussion, strategy and related tools' > <tagging@openstreetmap.org> > Subject: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - highway strip > > Hi, > > proposing a new value aeroway=highway_strip for landing strips that > are normally used as a part of a highway, but can be closed either > because of a military exercise or emergency landing for aeroplane > landing. The tag should only be used when the strip has been > dedicated as an emergency landing strip, other possibly suitable > emergency landing strips should not be tagged. > > Currently there are a few highway strips that have been tagged with > aeroway=highway_strip (in addition to the proper highway=* tag). > Others have been tagged as aeroway=runway, which causes the strip to > be rendered the same way as an aerodrome runway, which isn't sensible. > There should be a way to separate strips that have been dedicated as > emergency landing strips but are otherwise in use as a highway and > normal runways / dedicated emergency landing strips. > > The proposal can be found at > https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/highway_strip . > > Best regards, > -- > Jyri-Petteri Paloposki > > _______________________________________________ > Tagging mailing list > Tagging@openstreetmap.org > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging _______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
