2018-06-26 0:19 GMT+02:00 François Lacombe <fl.infosrese...@gmail.com>:
> As we see that tower:type is cluttered by power values here, it would be > great to move to a new key. > https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:tower:type > > The cluttering is real : a power tower can also be used as a communication > tower and we can't tag it. > tower:type is too restrictive also. > tower:type is intended as the main reason for a tower, I believe. If someone puts a communication device on top of a power tower, it can still be seen as power tower without the type of tower changing (there is no intrinsic meaning of "type" anyway, it only gets defined by the values that are associated). Communication capabilities of the installation could get a new tag (for the tower as a node) or antennas and things could be added. There is a proposed relation for attaching things to nodes, and some mappers are using "attached_to" as a tag. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Relations/Proposed/Node https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/keys/attached_to Cheers, Martin
_______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
