I also agree with the location tag as it say it is underwater, while the other method say that the path is made of "water" (as it would be made of gravel or asphalt in other places).
Note that the tag layer=-1 don't mean anything by itself (if there is no other data at the same location) as it is a relative tag (layer -1 means below other element with layer 0 or above). And as you are not below the water but in it, you can't technically use that to indicate underwater element. One example of feature below the water is the "Channel Tunnel" between France and England, where it is technically in the rocks below the sea, that's not the same thing that you want here. :-) 2018-08-08 11:18 GMT+02:00 Javier Sánchez Portero <javiers...@gmail.com>: > I think that location=underwater is more exact that surface=water. With > the second I expect to walk over the water like Jesus. > > Javier > > El mié., 8 ago. 2018 a las 1:13, Warin (<61sundow...@gmail.com>) escribió: > >> On 08/08/18 09:01, marc marc wrote: >> > Le 08. 08. 18 à 00:26, Warin a écrit : >> >> A scuba or snorkel route - some concrete drums with a chain between >> then >> >> and signs for people to follow. Like an under sea path. >> > highway=path + location=underwater ? :) >> >> Humm >> >> highway=path >> >> layer=-1 >> >> surface=water >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Tagging mailing list >> Tagging@openstreetmap.org >> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging >> > > _______________________________________________ > Tagging mailing list > Tagging@openstreetmap.org > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging > >
_______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
