For such a subjective thing, it should be mapped by each openstreetmap member : djakk maps this area as dangerous, baloo as not dangerous, etc and the renderer makes an average.
djakk Le sam. 18 août 2018 à 06:26, Paul Johnson <ba...@ursamundi.org> a écrit : > > > On Fri, Aug 17, 2018, 16:17 Adam Franco <adamfra...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> >> Another "risk" case would be an area where a civil war or conflict has >> divided who controls what land. Either side of the line of control may be >> incredibly risky for people affiliated with the other side but not to the >> supporters of those in control. >> > > At least this is objectively reportable and we have tagging for this as a > result: Disputed territory is mapped as part of each party state as well > as disputed=yes on the lines actually under dispute as a basic minimum. > Though this doesn't tell you if the dispute is, say, a low-simmering > situation on the level of party states playing professional capture the > flag (Denmark by way of Greenland vs Canada on Hans Island in the Kennedy > Strait) or a multilateral bloody humanitarian crisis like Kashmir. > >> _______________________________________________ > Tagging mailing list > Tagging@openstreetmap.org > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging >
_______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
