2. Październik 2018 13:30 od pla16...@gmail.com <mailto:pla16...@gmail.com>: > On Tue, Oct 2, 2018 at 10:47 AM Mateusz Konieczny <> matkoni...@tutanota.com > <mailto:matkoni...@tutanota.com>> > wrote: > >> >> 2. Oct 2018 11:44 by >> marc_marc_...@hotmail.com >> <mailto:marc_marc_...@hotmail.com>>> : >> >> >>> or a school that has 3 buildings on the same street but with other >>> buildings among themselves that do not belong to the school. >>> >> >> >> >> >> Sounds like a simple multipolygon with these 3 buildings as outer ways. >> >> >> >> >> Can you link this case if that is more complicated? >> >> > I can give you a case that is more complicated. The University of Edinburgh. > As well as a main> campus, and a subsidiary mini-campus, it has individual > buildings scattered all around the city.> It could be mapped as a > multipolygon but it would be a lot of work. Imagine using a multipolygon> > natural=wood to handle many individual, widely-spaced trees by poking lots > ofi rregular, large holes> in it where trees aren't. > See > https://www.ed.ac.uk/maps/maps <https://www.ed.ac.uk/maps/maps>> And > note that what you get there is the first of five tabs> covering different > agglomerations of buildings. > > I think the only feasible way of handling this would be a site relation. > Maybe you can think of a better> way of handling it. Why selecting buildings and tagging them to site relation is easier than selecting building and adding them to a multipolygon realation?
_______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
