Am Mo., 15. Okt. 2018 um 13:55 Uhr schrieb Lionel Giard < lionel.gi...@gmail.com>:
> > For tourism=* tag, for me, it is just a method to not tag each artwork > with "tourism=attraction" i would suppose (as they are probably all an > attraction), while a parliament *could *be a tourism=attraction, while > another part of it (or another parliament building) is of no particular > touristic value ! > I am pretty sure it is the opposite way: all parliaments (or almost) are tourist attractions, but most public art isn't. Just a few examples of things that can undoubtfully (I think?) be considered artwork, and are clearly no tourist attractions. And these are even sculptures set up by the government at prominent places, not graffiti informally applied under dark bridges or something like this. https://www.mapillary.com/app/?lat=41.86052699999999&lng=12.498110999999994&z=17&pKey=8MF90bV-hB3dm6WKADz20Q&focus=photo&x=0.1997206436619774&y=0.58040952107982&zoom=1.747553574261222 https://www.google.com/maps/@41.8609864,12.4858747,3a,75y,47.62h,96.46t/data=!3m5!1e1!3m3!1s_Q0AICeKMXgcdHMkGp18Rg!2e0!6s%2F%2Fgeo1.ggpht.com%2Fcbk%3Fpanoid%3D_Q0AICeKMXgcdHMkGp18Rg%26output%3Dthumbnail%26cb_client%3Dmaps_sv.tactile.gps%26thumb%3D2%26w%3D203%26h%3D100%26yaw%3D92.65221%26pitch%3D0%26thumbfov%3D100 https://www.google.com/maps/@41.8620511,12.4776334,3a,20.1y,102.9h,88.2t/data=!3m6!1e1!3m4!1sLf6XhgDVItqmeVsigDfrUQ!2e0!7i16384!8i8192 https://www.google.com/maps/@41.8365953,12.4692321,3a,33y,277.26h,100.23t/data=!3m6!1e1!3m4!1sOYjD7uTzNA68OPjgQJiIlg!2e0!7i16384!8i8192 https://www.google.com/maps/@41.8226411,12.465383,3a,60.7y,353.96h,106.56t/data=!3m6!1e1!3m4!1sLV51ZinWzmMAMA0_-FVYCQ!2e0!7i16384!8i8192 .... Cheers, Martin
_______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
