Considering heated discussions usually follow object tags, I won't expect the same amount of people to argue about change set tags (I sometimes forget they exist). Seems logical, although to me qa processing seems complicated to process/fit in a tag...
Ant 07.01.2019, в 22:51, Bryan Housel <bhou...@gmail.com> написал(а): > iD now integrates with the KeepRight Q/A tool.. This is pretty great, and you > should try it out: > https://twitter.com/bhousel/status/1081398222176817152 > > > But I have a tagging question. > > As we roll out this feature, as well as other Q/A tool integrations, some > people would like to be able to have the issues that they are closing appear > in their changeset comment, or hashtag, or some other tag. > > It seems like the obvious solution - adding a changeset comment like “closes > #keepright-123” - is ok but not great. It doesn’t really say what the user > did, and we will quickly run into the 255 char limit if the user closes a lot > of issues. > > So I’m thinking of introducing changeset tags like “closes:xxxxx=123;456;789” > where xxxxx can be a tracking service like “keepright”, “osmose”, > “improveosm”, “maproulette” or any other issue tracker we want to connect iD > to. > > Thoughts? > > Reply here or on https://github.com/openstreetmap/iD/issues/5679 > > If there aren’t any serious objections, I’ll probably add this in a few days. > > Thanks! > Bryan > > _______________________________________________ > Tagging mailing list > Tagging@openstreetmap.org > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
_______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
