On Sat, 23 Feb 2019 at 12:54, henkevdb <m...@henkevdb.be> wrote: > Possibility to 'introduce' a Key:access=restricted ... with description ; > traffic only open for mentioned*=yes .
IMHO: What is the advantage over using access=no? access=no already compounds like this. This also works in parallel with existing schemes, like restriction=no_left_turn + except=bus. > Could be a simple 'replacement' for several others, like i.e. ; > > access=restricted + agricultural=yes (because ;"Only for agricultural > traffic") > and access=restricted + forestry=yes (because; "Only for forestry traffic.") access=no + agricultural=yes access=no + forestry=yes More specific tag overrides the general "access" tag > and access=restricted + delivery=yes (because; "Only when delivering to the > element") access=delivery is in the wiki table and already has 12000 uses Possibly many cases can be described as access=destination which has 247000 uses > Because there is some 'confusing' for several 'cases' -> > https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=65458 highway=track + foot=yes + bicycle=yes + motor_vehicle=private should cover it, optionally also access=no (which is then overridden for foot=yes, bicycle=no, motor_vehicle=private) You said in the forum "not such a good tag for paths along watercourses" to access=private but I don't really understand why you think this. --Jarek _______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging