On Wed, Feb 27, 2019 at 1:45 AM Paul Johnson <[email protected]> wrote: > > That actually looks pretty correct. It's a state highway and emergency > vehicles are allowed to travel on it, so emergency=yes would be appropriate > as well. ref=MI 185 would be better, since US references are XX YYY where XX > is the state postal abbreviation (NOT SH, SR, K, M or whatever), but > source:maxspeed=US:rural makes no sense at all (not just here, but in any > context).
I never thought that emergency access would determine highway classification. It seems like a secondary use of the way, not its main use/purpose. Most pedestrian ways (highway=pedestrian) are physically possible for emergency vehicles and usually they are allowed to use them, though slowly and carefully. -- Fernando Trebien _______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
