Hello Mateusz, You can not render correctly with a bad tagging, and that is the case here : in France, a trunk road have 2 lanes and oneway=yes by default, not in UK.
I understand your criticism about the values I’ve used, it is not definitive :). Except maybe the values for road_level : they should be like the values of admin_level. Julien “djakk” Le dim. 3 mars 2019 à 20:21, Mateusz Konieczny <matkoni...@tutanota.com> a écrit : > "I would have expected the first road be rendered not like the 3 last > roads, > those last 3 roads should have been rendered the same as they look the > same" > > Is it tagging or rendering discussion? > > Because as far as as rendering is concerned you can already do that, just > use surface/lanes/oneway tags. > > In general highway=* tag is not about how road looks like, it is rather > about its > importance in road system (with sole exception of highway=motorway). > > It is hard to be sure without real proposal but I am not fan of tags like > looks_like=FR_urban_motorway or road_class=UK_motorway > > And I am against tags like importance_local=5 or road_level=1. > Numeric values in tracktype=* were a mistake, it is really hard to > remember > what is the difference between tracktype=grade3 and tracktype=grade4. > > Mar 3, 2019, 7:02 PM by djakk.dj...@gmail.com: > > Hello ! > > I’ve updated > https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/User:Djakk/new_tagging_scheme_for_roads > > To answer the original question of this thread, I wish you can use > importance_local=5 or 6 with abutters=rural or residential ;) > > > _______________________________________________ > Tagging mailing list > Tagging@openstreetmap.org > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging >
_______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
