marc marc wrote: > imho nearly no routing tools (nor foot nor bus) is currently > able to use a relation type=route with relations as child.
cycle.travel can. I don't particularly care what's decided, but I would like it to be consistent (which right now it certainly isn't), and personally I don't see the need for type=superroute when you can just have relations as children of type=route. I like Sarah's proposal for route_segment=yes. Richard -- Sent from: http://gis.19327.n8.nabble.com/Tagging-f5258744.html _______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
