I don' think we should use no, but private. But as others have stated, I can't really think of a changing table that should be mapped in osm but isn't accessible even for customers. But us this really a point we need to discuss? Can't we just say that changing_table:access should be used with values of the access key and let mappers decide which one is the most apptopiate? Am Mo., Apr. 22, 2019 at 14:46 schrieb Valor Naram<valin...@gmx.net>: _______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
_______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
_______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
