Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - Baby changing table

[Valor Naram]

I now splited the table into two parts so you can see how the wiki will look like (not equal)

See
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/baby_changing_tables#Tagging

-------- Original Message --------
Subject: Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - Baby changing table
From: Valor Naram
To: "Tag discussion, strategy and related tools"
CC:

I've already made a suggestion to split the wiki pages into two parts:

The first one describes the key "changing_table" as a replacement for "diaper". This section will compare the old tagging with the new tagging without introducing new subkeys.

The second one describes the extensions (adding of more information which are fully optional to provide)

-------- Original Message --------
Subject: Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - Baby changing table
From: marc marc
To: tagging@openstreetmap.org
CC:

no:) (or more exactly: it has been said but I say it again
in case you missed it)

I notice that the page has almost doubled in size :(
I wonder if you shouldn't split the proposal into two:

a minimalist proposal that takes the rela data from the diaper=* tag
and provides a better schema to encode it, an idea that I fully support.

another proposal to promote all other information (fee: there are really
paid changing tables in the free toilets ? presence of straps or
a pillow: there is really a parent who will base his choice on this
criterion ? changing_table:wheelchair:description:xx : there is really
a utility that a contributor describe in his own language that the
changing table is inaccessible like all those I have seen ?
maybe my experience is not diversified enough

furthermore the proposal was based on the principle of harmonizing tags
with what is done for other objects, but now it introduces
inconsistencies (features=bench <> bench=yes for example)


Le 25.04.19 à 19:16, Valor Naram a écrit :
> There's no discussion concerning the proposal of "baby changing table"
> anymore. What's happening? Should I start the voting process? Are all
> words said?
>
> Answer "no" (with or without any reason) and I won't start the voting.
>
>
> Cheers
>
> Sören alias Valor Naram
>
>
> -------- Original Message --------
> Subject: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - Baby changing table
> From: Valor Naram
> To: tagging@openstreetmap.org
> CC:
>
>
> *Definition:* A tag to mark the possibility to change the baby's nappy
> *Proposal page:*
> https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/baby_changing_tables
>
> Please join the discussion and I will spend time to make changes.
>
> Cheerio
>
> Sören alias Valor Naram
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Tagging mailing list
> Tagging@openstreetmap.org
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
>

_______________________________________________
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging

_______________________________________________
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging