Am Mo., 20. Mai 2019 um 12:59 Uhr schrieb Mateusz Konieczny <
matkoni...@tutanota.com>:
>
>
>
> 20 May 2019, 02:05 by tagging@openstreetmap.org:
>
> to me the individual areas are obviously farmyards, and the other areas
> are easily mappable - but what about the entire landuse? is it commercial?
> farmyard?
>
> I currently tagged as commercial, but I have the suspicion that is wrong -
> or every farm in Japan would be landuse=commercial, but this is like a
> weird tourist-farm-zoo kind of place.
>
> landuse=commercial seems to be for trade/service ("tertiary sector").
>
> So while a typical farm would not be landuse=commercial one that is more
> tourism attraction
> that a farm may qualify.
>
I would not tag a zoo or a farm as "commercial" landuse. landuse=commercial
in OSM is basically about administration, because retail has its own tag.
On the other hand I agree, as there wasn't a definition (beside an example)
for this for a very long time, the meaning of the tag may not be clear in
general, and eventually, retail may be considered a subclass of a
commercial landuse (as well in OSM). It is not completely unseen to have
different levels of specifity on the same level of landuse (e.g.
landuse=farmland / orchard / vineyard /...). Basically, landuse is a mess,
and it tends to get worse with the time (e.g. landuse=religious which may
be orthogonal to residential, commercial, ... ). Different readings are
normal because the tag is not well defined.
> I would probably not map it as landuse=commercial but also not revert edit
> that added
> landuse=commercial (assuming that it is a de facto zoo).
>
+1
Cheers,
Martin
_______________________________________________
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
