I can see what maintenance burden this notation could bring, but I would need more information to see what we could gain from it.
landuse=* seemed appropriate for most use cases I have encountered. Why do we need to tag this on a building resolution? What data consumers did you have in mind? What common interest does this annotation serve? What is the verification criteria? Do I need to station next to the building in working hours for a given amount of time and declare it occupied if I see any person entering or leaving, and mark it unoccupied otherwise? Or is it enough if I see indirect indications, such as open windows (what is they are motorized and remote controlled), lighting (some leave it always on for security)? Is it enough if I see a resident through the window? How do I know if the person is not merely a guard or an intermittent maintenance personal? If a storage building complex is only occupied by a guard (supervised=* / surveillance:type=guard), do you consider it occupied? Do you consider weekend houses occupied if they are only occupied intermittently or even seasonally? How do I verify this? Note that we usually do not add fixme kind of tagging for the sole purpose of marking the absence of regular information, as by definition, a blank map is missing an infinite amount of information and we would definitely not like to store so many fixme's. Although I acknowledge it is sometimes easy to distinguish abandoned buildings, especially if it is missing furniture, doors or windows, but we have life cycles for that. On Fri, May 24, 2019 at 12:40 PM Martin Koppenhoefer <dieterdre...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > sent from a phone > > > On 23. May 2019, at 19:05, marc marc <marc_marc_...@hotmail.com> wrote: > > > > following that, building=yes building:use=yes is better > > yes can be improved when you'll known that's the current use, > > if it not the same as what is excepted for this building look > > > +1, seems to reflect the amount of knowledge. > The combination of building=* with building:use=no might be interesting as > well > > Cheers, Martin > _______________________________________________ > Tagging mailing list > Tagging@openstreetmap.org > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging >
_______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
