At this point the discussion should really be continued (a) under another subject and (b) on a different mailing list (maybe legal-talk?)
Bye Frederik On 26.06.19 07:16, Mateusz Konieczny wrote: > 26 Jun 2019, 00:01 by tagging@openstreetmap.org: > > in particular for non-commercial and scientific use > > This are not relevant at all, OSM data is not restricted in how it can > be used. > > I don't know to what extent this is applicable for an international > project such as OSM, but there are fair-use and non-commercial ex- > ceptions in the copyright statutes of many countries > > Both have limitations that make incompatible with OSM licensing > requirements. > > Merely reusing names of watercourses is not a breach of copyright, if > you research them in non-database publications > > OSM is a database > > _or_ if you do copy > few excerpts > > This way lies madness, as there is no way to ensure that only one user > copied > something. Multiple users copying only few excerpts each is not allowed. > > (UrhG speaks of 15% for scientific, non-commercial use) > > How many for commercial use? > > > _______________________________________________ > Tagging mailing list > Tagging@openstreetmap.org > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging > -- Frederik Ramm ## eMail frede...@remote.org ## N49°00'09" E008°23'33" _______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
