On 14/07/19 16:48, Pee Wee wrote:
Op vr 12 jul. 2019 om 09:13 schreef Marc Gemis <marc.ge...@gmail.com
<mailto:marc.ge...@gmail.com>>:
On Fri, Jul 12, 2019 at 8:50 AM Pee Wee <piewi...@gmail.com
<mailto:piewi...@gmail.com>> wrote:
Why would a private garden require a different key? Do we tag a
private wood / forest in a different way than one that is accessible
by the public? Do private parking lots get a different amenity-key ?
No, we refine this with additional tags.
This method can be applied to private gardens as well.
That is a good question. I would agree with you if the k/v would be
e.g. natural=garden. This describes what it is and not what it is used
for. Leisure=garden does not only describe what it is (garden) but
also what it is used for (leisure). If I look at all the other leisure
values they give me the impression that they are meant for places one
can go to recreate and mainly publicly accessible.
OSM maps leisure=pitch in 'private' areas - eg football fields in
stadiums and club grounds... these are not 'freely available' for all to
use.
One could argue that you can also recreate in your own garden but
still these private gardens are a dissonant from all the other leisure
values.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:leisure
"The leisure tag is for places people go in their spare time."
Nothing here says it has to be 'open to the public'.
Most people go into their garden in their spare time. So 'private
gardens' match the leisure key.
_______________________________________________
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
