Cafés^, not cages. Android swiping strikes again. On Wed, Aug 7, 2019, 10:19 PM Leif Rasmussen <354...@gmail.com> wrote:
> I've seen cages that are also bike shops, so whatever tagging solution we > up with should work with any type of shop. > Leif Rasmussen > > On Wed, Aug 7, 2019, 9:38 PM Morten Lange via Tagging < > tagging@openstreetmap.org> wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> I wonder how I should tag bicycle shops that are not shops in the >> traditional "buy our products" sense. >> >> A community-centre that is also offers bicycle repairs / is a bicycle >> repair shop. >> Or a bicycle "shop" that primarily focuses on refurbishing disused bikes. >> Or a community-centre or similar that provides job training for various >> groups, and such training happens through running a bicycle repair service >> for the public. >> >> >> I have found a few such bicycle repair and maintenance "shops" on OSM. >> These are the searches I have used in overpass-turbo.eu: >> >> (shop=bicycle or service:bicycle:repair=yes) and >> ownership=private_nonprofit >> or >> community_centre=bicycle_maintenance >> or >> service:bicycle:repair=yes and amenity=community_centre >> >> >> Many of those that I described, to my eperience do not offer >> Do-it-yourself (more on DIY below). >> They still are something else than your "ordinary" bikeshop, and I think >> that is significant to reflect in tagging. >> So I wonder how best to tag those. My experience is that most of them >> are non-profit. >> >> >> My preliminary conclusion is to use this on the nodes I have mapped in >> Oslo and elsewhere in Norway: >> shop=bicycle >> service:bicycle:repair=yes >> ownership=private_nonprofit (or ownership=public_nonprofit) >> >> >> >> Some additinional thoughts : >> >> A. >> If the place is a Do-it-yourself shop it should be tagged as such. >> Searching for this tag and value I see the pair has been used quite a lot. >> For example for bicycle kitchens. >> service:bicycle:dyi=yes. >> >> B. >> Tagging primarily as a community centre? >> >> Some might suggest to use amenity=community_centre combined with >> community_centre=bicycle_maintenance >> >> But then the community centre feature will overshadow the bikeshop >> aspect. (And in current renderings the place would not pop up as a place >> where you can fix your bicycle/tricycle) >> I would like to have it the other way around, that is to emphasise the >> service offered to the public, rather than type of establishment. >> >> Is it OK to use >> community_centre=bicycle_maintenance >> together with >> shop=bicycle ? >> >> >> >> >> >> Any other comments? >> Could a single "freshly invented" value do the trick like >> service:bicycle:repair=work_training >> The downside is that if searching for the value =yes, those >> nodes/ways/relations are not found. >> >> >> Regards / Kveðja / Hilsen >> Morten Lange >> >> >> P.S >> >> Bicycle kitchens and bicycle librarier are somewhat different animals. >> >> Searching the web for bicycle kitchen, bicycle library etc turns up quite >> a few references. >> >> But I could not find them on OSM. >> That is until I specifically searched in overpass-turbo for >> >> shop=bicycle and service:bicycle:diy=yes >> >> Rome, Paris and Berlin are virtually peppered. >> >> >> And for the case of the bicycle library ..... >> Would this be a possibe way to tag them >> service:bicycle:rental=library >> ? >> >> -- >> Morten Lange, Oslo >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Tagging mailing list >> Tagging@openstreetmap.org >> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging >> >
_______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
