On Fri, Aug 16, 2019 at 10:54:52PM +0100, Paul Allen wrote: > On Fri, 16 Aug 2019 at 22:33, Martin Koppenhoefer <dieterdre...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > > > > The way I see it, we’re mapping the world, as it is. Not just places where > > the general public may have an interest in navigating to it. If you were to > > make an analysis about the functional structure of a city you would want to > > know about the offices, even if they are not open to anyone besides their > > clients and business partners. > > > > And parcel deliverers. And others. Just because most people don't need or > want to know > about them, that doesn't mean nobody wants to know.
But surely parcels are seldom delivered to an "office" but typically to reception in a business. Of course, reception may be part of an office, especially in small organisations. But my point was that as I understood things, the office tag was typically used to indicate a place of business, rather than a real office which may or may not included. Of course, I have no problem with tagging significant real offices with the office tag. ael _______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
