> Great. Write your proposal around those designated areas. Put photos of the signage > in the proposal, if you have them.
As you've put yourself: a "designated area" is not equivalent to an "area with a signage". > The wiki page for leisure=fishing doesn't require verifiability because > that is an underlying > assumption of OSM. Likewise the word to look at the proposal is "dedicated". If in doubt about the place then seek for the information from the relevant authority. Otherwise don't tag. A lack of a specific feature at the OSM wiki doesn't mean you can't map this feature: "Any tags you like". I needed a tag for something. "So I've followed good practice and searched the Wiki, Map Features, Proposed features, Rejected features, Proposed Relations and mailing lists' archives and still can't find a tag for what I'd like to map. I'm proposing a coordinated and verifiable way to tag a feature. Do you have a better way to tag it? Then please do let us know. Anyway, as I wrote at times it's not possible to satisfy everyone's taste. I've just tried to express my thoughts as far as I've managed and actually I've found the discussion is quite useful. OK. It looks like there are no new comments on the proposal and it's time to move to the voting stage. -- Sent from: http://gis.19327.n8.nabble.com/Tagging-f5258744.html _______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
