Am 07.12.2019 um 09:33 schrieb Warin: > park_drive=no for parking of customers only or private. > These should already be tagged with an access tag to say this .. so it > is redundant? This form should not be explicitly stated but rather understood as implicit values. Similar to highway=footway, footway=designated implies. > > park_drive=yes where car pool parking is ok. > In my country this is the default. Unless there is some time limit > (and that limit would apply to all) then it is ok to park there for > any reason. The time limit should be indicated by some other tag .. so > this is redundant? After a lot of thinking I will =yes out, because it is already covered with designated or informal. > park_drive=informal for car pool parking that is neither allowed nor > forbidden??? No. It cannot be both 'not allowed' and 'not forbidden'. by =informal we mean that there is no explicit sign for parking and forming or driving in carpools, similar to =yes. For example, there are parking lots that are often used to form carpools, but are not intended, so parking lots for hikers. > park_drive=designated for car pool parking only?? Then it is an access > tag like access=customers. =designated describes explicitly designated parking spaces at, for example, motorway junctions that are public.
-- Mit freundlichen Grüßen Martin Scholtes
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
_______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
