On 08/12/19 10:54, Martin Scholtes wrote:
Am 07.12.2019 um 19:44 schrieb Philip Barnes:
On Thu, 2019-12-05 at 14:46 +0100, Martin Scholtes wrote:
Am 05.12.2019 um 12:41 schrieb Sören Reinecke via Tagging:
Allows the tag the mapping of carpool meeting points?
The proposal aims at marking parking places where one could meet to
carpool or which explicitly provide for parking one's vehicle and
forming a carpool.
An example would be a car park at a railway station, where you could
meet and carpool, but the car park is not explicitly intended for
this
purpose, but for travelling by public transport.
In that case you could very easily be in breach of the terms of use of
that car park. Occasional use may go unnoticed but one a public
database encourages such use then action could happen.
This type of tagging should only apply to officially designated places.
I have local knowledge of changes to parking conditions resulting in
changes to the conditions of use aimed at preventing such usage.
It may be that the person in question is using the parking lot contrary
to the service, but this is less noticeable on site.
In my opinion it should not be given for such a case, because =no is
standard.
There is also the case that it should be verifiable 'on the ground'. Where this
is 'casual' then it may not be a good think to include in OSM.
Where it is 'designated' then I would assume there is signage on the ground to
let people know, as such those areas should be in OSM.
_______________________________________________
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
