On Sun, 8 Dec 2019 at 21:55, Allroads <allroadswo...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Draw this image over the example, JOSM changes (not uploaded) drawn in. > https://i.postimg.cc/t70p6WXm/Neubr-ckcrossing.png > The area:highway=footway is correctly drawn in, but the footway is all > footway=sidewalk, your still walking on the sidewalk. I agree that you are on the sidewalk after coming down the steps, but i don't agree that every way inside area:highway=footway + footway=sidewalk (sidewalk area) is a highway=footway + footway=sidewalk, because there is only *one* sidewalk, not multiple. Otherwise, following your logic, all ways inside area:highway=tertiary – including ways from the centre of the road to kerbs (which you tagged footway=connection) – would have to be tagged highway=tertiary. In my opinion, the way from the end of the steps to the kerb is also a connection. > Other perpendicular waylines inside a area:highway does not need that, if so > then a other kind of value (I do not see the need for that) > > [...] > > Where do you need it, I think where kerbs are it is more important, and when > you use area:highway, *=connection we could render visualise it slightly > different. > https://i.postimg.cc/D0n5S70G/tpath.jpg > > [5]: https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/413988097 There's no kerb at this place. The only difference to the nearby T crossing with the track is the width of the two ways. Why should we need to tag the part of the path inside road area specifically (e.g. as footway=connection), but not the part of the track inside the road area? Regards Markus _______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
