Florimond Berthoux <florimond.berth...@gmail.com> het volgende geschreven: > > > Ok, you need examples : > this Eurovelo 3 is for tourism > https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/9351172#map=12/48.8454/2.4130&layers=C > this REVe Nord-Sud is for commute/every day cycling > https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/8664006#map=14/48.8784/2.3599&layers=C > as you can see in this video https://youtu.be/1dGtSZbUKew > and this is for road cycling > https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/163270#map=15/48.8577/2.2333&layers=C > as you can see in this video https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VLwNlVjTOKU >
I can't see the signposting of the routes in the videos, I assume because I don't know where to look? > Of course nobody will blame you if you use a touristic route for commuting, > and adding a tag tourism=yes doesn’t imply it can’t be used by every day > cyclists. > > What the point? If you are a commuter you’ll focus on fast and safe route, so > you’ll prefer REVe Nord-Sud than Eurovelo 3 at this place > https://www.cyclosm.org/#map=18/48.86796/2.35391/cyclosm > For instance, this information can be used for rendering map (like CyclOSM on > which I work) or routers (a tourist profile routing will prefer tourism > route). (just playing devil's advocate) Wouldn't renderers and routers prefer road attributes? >> _______________________________________________ > Tagging mailing list > Tagging@openstreetmap.org > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
_______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
