17 Jan 2020, 13:19 by marc_marc_...@hotmail.com: > Le 17.01.20 à 02:49, Joseph Eisenberg a écrit : > >>>> I'm unsure why Carto ignores such a popular tagging scheme. >>>> >>> Is it actually popular? >>> >> >> The place to request changed to Openstreetmap-carto is >> http://github.com/gravitystorm/openstreetmap-carto/issues >> >> According to taginfo, there are a total of 11,158 occurence of >> disused:man_made and disused:building http://overpass-turbo.eu/s/POy >> vs >> 27,446 uses of man_made=* and building=* with disused=yes: >> http://overpass-turbo.eu/s/POz >> >> So the "disused=yes" form is 2.5 times more popular for these >> features. >> > > the issue with disused=yes on building is http://overpass-turbo.eu/s/PPd > 1166 building + amnenity + disused=yes (same issue with shop) > what's the meaning ? > the amenity is disused and it's better to fix amenity=* with > disused:amnenity=* ? > the building was disused and after a new amenity was added and the > mapper forget (or don't known) to remove disused=yes ? > > Replacing disused=yes with building:use=no/vacant or disused:amnenity=* > depending on the context would at least make it possible to know the tag > concerned by the disused information > Or tag two separate objects as two separate objects. The same problem is with other tags such as name. See https://github.com/gravitystorm/openstreetmap-carto/issues/3487 and https://github.com/gravitystorm/openstreetmap-carto/issues/2999 for example of problems caused by such tagging.
_______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
