Hi,
On 17/01/20 12:08, European Water Project wrote:
2. Re: RFC free_water (François Lacombe)
I see your point and agree it would be preferable to develop a more
generalize nomenclature, but also think it is important to choose
something that is understandable to a newbie.
If we chose charge:water
<https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/w/index.php?title=Key:charge:water&action=edit&redlink=1>=free
<https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/w/index.php?title=Tag:charge:water%3Dfree&action=edit&redlink=1>we
would need to differentiate when the water is free to anyone (yes in
OSM speak) or just paying customers (customers in OSM speak).
We could use :
charge:water
<https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/w/index.php?title=Key:charge:water&action=edit&redlink=1>=<free
<https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/w/index.php?title=Tag:charge:water%3Dfree&action=edit&redlink=1>/fee>
access = <yes/no/customers>
container = <bring_own/provided>
In the above, European Water Project would only include cafés, bars,
etc. with
charge:water
<https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/w/index.php?title=Key:charge:water&action=edit&redlink=1>=free
<https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/w/index.php?title=Tag:charge:water%3Dfree&action=edit&redlink=1>
access = yes
container = bring_own
If you use the tag /access/ alone, it could refer to the "main" feature
(the bar or restaurant...).
And water is probably too general... I try suggesting to use
/tap_water/, that should clearly state that is not bottle water :-)
So it could be:
* tap_water=yes/no/customers
* tap_water:free=yes/no/customers
* tap_water:container=*
This way it seems to me you should be able to cover all the
possibilities clearly.
m2c
Ale
_______________________________________________
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
