No, I'm not talking about cycling on a sidewalk (I don't know why you thought that ??), I discuss continuous sidewalk and continuous cycleway together because it's the same layout, the same problem. And I'm doing that because I'm interesting in cycling infrastructure more than others. For instance this is a typical dutch continuous sidewalk/cycleway https://www.mapillary.com/app/?lat=52.3608851685737&lng=4.867902368825185&z=17&pKey=ru8z7_PBx5Ao2LU6TX2XfQ&focus=photo&x=0.4098509000113021&y=0.620642840587665&zoom=0
Anyhow I updated the page https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Continuous_Sidewalk continuous_sidewalk/continuous_cycleway=yes/no are now tags, so no more collision and can be used on the junction node or on the way. Le sam. 25 janv. 2020 à 18:36, Peter Elderson <pelder...@gmail.com> a écrit : > Ah, I see. You are talking about cycling on the sidewalk. Indeed, very > unusual in Nederland. To me it's strange to tag continuous_sidewalk mainly > for cycling. > > You talk of junction=continuous_sidewalk, I see no reason to even consider > that. > If you have a cycleway, footway or footcycleway around a roundabout, it > still has crossings with the roads.which can and often will differ, so IMO > the crossing nodes would carry the attributes. > > Well, I have given my thoughts, good luck with the proposal! > > Best, Peter Elderson > -- Florimond Berthoux
_______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
