Thanks, Markus, for your feedback. I agree with you, network fit better then brand.
I remove charity I think it is not usefull because it do not fit. The little free pantry is more about food for people in need. My intention was to document this with charity=yes. Best regards Markus aka ToastHawaii Von: Markus<mailto:selfishseaho...@gmail.com> Gesendet: Mittwoch, 26. Februar 2020 12:03 An: Tag discussion, strategy and related tools<mailto:tagging@openstreetmap.org> Betreff: Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - Food sharing Thanks, Markus, for writing this proposal. I like the proposed tag. Just two minor things regarding tags that can be used in combination: - brand=* Optional. Name of the brand or network of the facility if there is one visible. eg. I would change this to network=* as it seems to fit better. brand=* is mainly used for the brand of items being sold while we're already using network=* for bicycle sharing networks. - charity=* Optional. Add charity=yes if the food for those in need. It's not clear to me what you mean: a place where you can only donate food or a place where you can bring food but only poor people are allowed to take it away? If you have the first scenario in mind (donating only), i would rather use amenity=recycling, analogous to recycling:clothes=yes. Regards Markus aka SelfishSeahorse _______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
_______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging