> These "parks" often have identical characteristics to these tourism=*_site : they sometimes have a common reception desk for different camp_pitch, toilets, a drinking water point, ...
Many places in the USA are tagged leisure=park when they really ought to be boundary=protected area, or divided up into smaller areas which represent the actual feature. If the "park" is large, often only part of it is the campsite. In that case, create a new area which just includes the actual tourism=camp_site feature, if you can confirm the boundaries, and this should include the individual pitches as well. If there are more than one cluster of pitches which are widely separated and have a separate entrance or reception, there may be several separate tourism=camp_site areas. Your link did not work for me. Were you trying to show the relation with ID 6565934, perhaps? https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/6565934 - "High Cliff State Park". A "state park" is similar to a "national park" though smaller and managed by a State instead of the Federal (national) government, so it usually should be a boundary=protected_area instead of a leisure=park. In this case the State Park seems mainly for recreation, so it's possible that part of the area should be tagged leisure=park, but the part that is a historic site shouldn't be, nor the part that is a tourism=camp_site, etc... (I don't know the area well enough to re-map it myself) https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/en:High%20Cliff%20State%20Park?uselang=en-US - "The effigy mounds at the top of the escarpment have led to a small part of the park ... added to the National Register of Historic Places, listed as High Cliff Mounds" - that's not a leisure=park, but perhaps a historic=archeological_site (actually, it looks like these are already mapped). On 3/10/20, Marc M. <marc_marc_...@hotmail.com> wrote: > Hello, > > When fixing depreciated tag camp_site=camp_pitch, > I've found several of these in huge parks in the United States. > the current and approved definition of tourism=camp_pitch says that > sites are tourism=camp_site or tourism=caravan_site > however these parks often have identical characteristics to these > tourism=*_site : they sometimes have a common reception desk for > different camp_pitch, toilets, a drinking water point, ... > > what do you think is the best schema : > - Change the definition of tourism=camp_pitch to include these large > parks as a valid _site. > - add tourism=camp_site on the whole park ? with the default of having 2 > main tags on the same object > - other ideas ? > > one among others https://overpass-turbo.eu/s/Rsg > > Regards, > Marc > > _______________________________________________ > Tagging mailing list > Tagging@openstreetmap.org > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging > _______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
