The only thing that the proposal page still needs is a couple more detailed definitions for some of the tags.
The ones based on IUCN levels already have a fairly good description. But protection_class=recreation should be clarified - what exactly is protected here, and what sort of recreation are we talking about? It should be clear how this is different than a leisure=recreation_ground or sports_centre or =park. The tags protection_class=water, protection_class=culture, and protection_class=hazard might need slightly improved definitions too. Besides that, everything looks pretty good. -- Joseph Eisenberg _______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
