I think this is really great! I'm creating a site with Swedish routes for potentially setting FKT's, Fastest Known Time. Getting the GPX file (as well as distance and elevation) from a hiking route on Waymarked Trails is usually problematic if all alternative routes, excursions etc. are part of the same relation.
Question: Will there be any naming conventions of the different levels in the hierarchy, to make it easier to know what relation you're actually looking at? I see in the example the parent relation is called "[name] - main route and variations", with child relations called " [name] - main", " [name] - variation X", " [name] - connection" etc. If all routes are named in a similar way, it will be much easier to distinguish the relation levels from each other, particularly for users who don't know anything about relations. Apart from that, I'm looking forward to go through Swedish routes to tag them according to these role values. /Daniel Den ons 20 maj 2020 kl 13:36 skrev Peter Elderson <pelder...@gmail.com>: > Please review and comment on this proposal: > > > https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/Recreational_route_relation_roles > > > Definition: specification of role values for members of a recreational > route relation > > The status has changed to proposed as of today > > Comments can be placed on the talk page and/or here. Please note that > this proposal is meant to get a basic role set approved and documented. > > Thanks for helping to finally get this done! > > Best, Peter Elderson > _______________________________________________ > Tagging mailing list > Tagging@openstreetmap.org > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging >
_______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
