On Sun, May 24, 2020, 18:51 Shawn K. Quinn <skqu...@rushpost.com> wrote:
> On 5/24/20 15:26, Volker Schmidt wrote: > > I just noticed an apparent contradiction regarding the use of the oneway > > tag between the wiki pages key:oneway > > <https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:oneway> and motorway > > <https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway%3Dmotorway> . > > The former states: > > "Some tags (such as junction > > <https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:junction>=roundabout > > <https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:junction%3Droundabout>, highway > > <https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:highway>=motorway > > <https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway%3Dmotorway> and others) > > imply oneway=yes and therefore the oneway tag is optional, > > the latter states: > > "These ways should all point direction of travel and be tagged with > > oneway <https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:oneway>=yes" > > <https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:oneway%3Dyes> > > > > What is the agreed standard, if any? > > It can't hurt to specify oneway=yes. I have noticed that the JOSM style > that shows lane counts and lane use will sometimes not show ways > properly if oneway=yes isn't there, but that's probably a bug in the > style more than an indictment of implying oneway=yes. > I'm on the side of "team tag explicitly" on this. If anything, it gives validators more to work with if you start doing something weird. >
_______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
