On 7/6/20 1:31 am, Jarek Piórkowski wrote:
On Sat, 6 Jun 2020 at 11:23, Andy Townsend <ajt1...@gmail.com> wrote:
On 06/06/2020 16:18, Phake Nick wrote:
在 2020年6月6日週六 11:03，Warin <61sundow...@gmail.com> 寫道：
As a general tourist I would have no interest in traveling along a
railway route here nothing remains of the railway.
OSM is not *only* for general tourist.
I bet even a general tourist would be interested if they could be assured that
a route was flat :)
And didn't have buildings or factories built on it ;)
Home owners would not be happy with tourists walking through lunch because OSM
has a tourist/railline line through their house.
Factory OH&S people would be very upset with tourists walking through the
factory because OSM has a tourist/railline line through the factory.
The tourists would not be impressed with the 'railway' either if there was
nothing 'railway' to see, even if the route is flat.
A general tourist walking along a road that has no sign of a railway would not
be impressed if it were shown as a railway on OSM.
Other road users would be perplexed if the road were shown as a railway...
If it's a recognized route that's signposted as something like
"Historical Railway Trail" then it can be a relation.
As a walking route, yes. It is no longer a railway, that is in the past.
If it's not
signposted and there's no trace of it left on the ground, what exactly
is being mapped?
History?
_______________________________________________
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
