I know several bicycle route segments on water: ferryboat, waterbus, private on-demand boat. On rail: One route contained a normal rail segment. By Bus: scheduled buses on road segments with heavy traffic. We should consider these other means as well in any proposal. :
On Thu, 18 Jun 2020, 20:32 Francesco Ansanelli, <franci...@gmail.com> wrote: > Dear all, > > I discussed with local mappers about the need of a role "take_train" or > "public_transport" to fix bicycle routes... > Would anybody be so kind to make a proposal about this post? > > Many thanks > Cheers > Francesco > > Il giorno lun 16 dic 2019 alle ore 13:49 Francesco Ansanelli < > franci...@gmail.com> ha scritto: > >> >> >> Il lun 16 dic 2019, 10:56 Warin <61sundow...@gmail.com> ha scritto: >> >>> On 16/12/19 20:21, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote: >>> >>> Am Mo., 16. Dez. 2019 um 10:02 Uhr schrieb Volker Schmidt < >>> vosc...@gmail.com>: >>> >>>> Can we come back to talking about a solution. >>>> Maybe an appropriate new role value could be a solution: >>>> role=take_train on the corresponding train section in the bicycle route, >>>> for example. >>>> However, this would provide an easy way to add train ride details. >>>> >>> >>> >>> I would add the train route relation as member, rather than the >>> individual railway ways. >>> >>> If the entire train route is used then ok. But if only a section is used >>> then I think the relevant ways only should be included. >>> >>> If a simple dataconsumer is not aware, it would should a hole in the >>> bicycle relation (what IMHO is a good way to show that there is something >>> special, in particular that you cannot simply ride your bike there), while >>> a data consumer who specifically understands the situation could give >>> specific directions. I agree a specific role also seems reasonable (could >>> be extended to ferries, trams, aerialways, etc.) >>> >>> >>> role=take_train would not work for ferries, buses, canoes etc. >>> >>> >>> I think role=transport could work .. provided the way identifies what >>> form of transport is used ... that could be a problem for bus routes? >>> >>> role=transport_train/transport_bus??? >>> >> >> >> I agree with the 'transport' name, it's the same I was thinking too... >> Also 'transport_relation' could be fine. >> Since you are adding a relation as segment you will get the type of >> relation from it. >> At this point I'd remove all information from the rail, do a relation >> ptv2 and add that to my route. >> >> >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Tagging mailing list >>> Tagging@openstreetmap.org >>> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging >>> >> _______________________________________________ > Tagging mailing list > Tagging@openstreetmap.org > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging >
_______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging