bicycle=explicit_no sounds to me like "there is an explicit sign forbidding this", not "bicycle vehicle itself is prohibited, not just cycling".
Jul 21, 2020, 23:48 by allroadswo...@gmail.com: > There lots of forest roads/path, where the bicycle/pushed carried is > prohibited. Mostly, private owned land with a access_sign. > “the bicycle” “transportation vehicle” is prohibited. > > Because, navigation programs do not us bicycle=no, as a hard no, there is the > need for a extra value. > bicycle=explicit_no, means “the vehicle” is prohibited. > > Why a value? > We need a one value, otherwise a lot of more keys, which makes it things > complicated. At the end it means for all explicit no! > bicycle_pushed <>> => no <> > motorcycle_pushed=no > horse_pushed=no ;-) > moped_pushed=no > mofa_pushed=no > etc. > > Better one value, key=explicit_no > > What do you think? > > If we do not solve this problem, this stays forever. > > On the wiki page dismount, this bicycle_pushed is mentioned. > https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:bicycle%3Ddismount > For me a wrong advise. > The problem is wider for more transportation modes, even for other product to > carry around. > > Private access_sign rules, can go much further then traffic_sign. In what is > prohibited. > What the owner think and write down on the sign is valid. > The skateboard is prohibited, means you can not carry a skateboard around > with you. > skateboard=explicit_no > > I need this value to do it correctly. Where the bicycle is no allowed. Or a > other value meaning the same. > >
_______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
