> > My guess is that the adoption of a dismounted_bicycle=* tag or similar > would require significantly *less* work than re-examining all current > bicycle=no ways. > > Yes, I think that would be workable.
> Nonetheless, I completely agree with you, =no should mean =no! But I > fear we're in the minority, and that the sloppy tagging of the past has > a formidable inertia. > > J > > I disagree, see my other answer relating to agriculture. Also, it contradicts the principle of least surprise that most countries do not have such restrictions, hence regardless of how you would like to redefine `bicycle=no`, half of the world would still keep tagging it incorrectly.
_______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
