Agreed that is beyond being a curb, it is a wall of sorts. For it to be a curb in my opinion, it should be passable by a fit (non-disabled) person easily, Once it becomes too tall to pass it is a wall
On Thu, 30 Jul 2020, 01:17 Jarek Piórkowski, <ja...@piorkowski.ca> wrote: > On Wed, 29 Jul 2020 at 19:46, Martin Koppenhoefer > <dieterdre...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> On 30. Jul 2020, at 00:03, Clifford Snow <cliff...@snowandsnow.us> > wrote: > >> The wiki has a raised kerb as any kerb greater than 3cm in height. Your > definition of a regular kerb is one greater than or equal to 10cm > > > > when reading the term raised kerb I’d rather think about something like > 25-40cm, while 4 cm surely wouldn’t be considered “raised” > > You have to consider the purpose of the tag. To a wheelchair user, > there might not be a lot of practical difference between 25 and 10 cm, > because both are impassable. > > > I agree that introducing regular kerbs would only make sense if the > raised kerb would change its definition (or be deprecated). > > > > eg this is pretty raised > > > http://i.dailymail.co.uk/i/pix/2013/07/29/article-2380778-1B0CC26E000005DC-458_634x386.jpg > > I would suggest that's a low retaining wall > > --Jarek > > _______________________________________________ > Tagging mailing list > Tagging@openstreetmap.org > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging >
_______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
