sent from a phone
> On 8. Aug 2020, at 17:58, Paul Johnson <ba...@ursamundi.org> wrote: > > Which honestly makes me surprised we have two separate amenities for parking > already, since amenity=parking, access=no, bicycle=designated would be > equivalent to amenity=bicycle_parking, and would make it easier to describe > unusual parking situations (like a parking area that only allowed bicycles > and buses to park) more intuitively. this tagging would probably exclude pedestrians from walking through the parking. It is also inconsistent with the definition of amenity=parking: “ A place for parking cars“ It seems pointless to discuss these hypothetical alternative tagging definitions when we all know that if is very unlikely that the definition of a well established tag will be changed completely. Cheers Martin
_______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
