On Fri, Oct 9, 2020 at 12:38 PM Mateusz Konieczny <matkoni...@tutanota.com> wrote:
> > 9 paź 2020, 15:33 od ba...@ursamundi.org: > > On Fri, Oct 9, 2020 at 3:06 AM Mateusz Konieczny via Tagging < > tagging@openstreetmap.org> wrote: > > For me it sounds sort-of similar (the same definition, just swap "motor > vehicle" with "bicycle", > or use "vehicle" to cover both ) but with drastically different > functionality. > > Similarly like "parking" and "bicycle parking" or "motorway" and > "cycleway". > > > Eeeh, motorway and cycleway make sense because they're definitely two > fairly different beasts, but for amenities and parking, motor_vehicle=no, > bicycle=designated seems like a better idea in retrospect. > > I guess that it depends on personal > preferences. > > I really dislike need to enter multiple tags > to specify basic type (yes I like > highway=bus_stop) > I mean, sure, but it's also not like highway=services are intrinsically and inherently motorist oriented, either. Not sure how many don't cater to motorists, but I don't see a reason to make a tag for the same thing but doesn't allow motor vehicles... Presets are your friend to reduce input fatigue.
_______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging