It has been raised on a private discussion if we could mention whether a private house or an industrial site has a guard dog that is easily identifiable by its barking. It is my viewpoint that from a mapping ethics standpoint, we should not map this because it may compromise a home's security. What do you think?
On Sat, Sep 26, 2020 at 12:01 PM bkil <bkil.hu...@gmail.com> wrote: > > I welcome your comments on the following proposal: > > Those with vision impairment should also have the right to explore and > map their surroundings in ways appropriate for them. We should have a > unified way to specify the kind of noise that is generated by an > object. The most useful ones are those which are right beside a > footway and which is clearly audible when walking by. > > The existing documentation for man_made=street_cabinet should be > updated to deprecate sound=* and the few existing OSM occurrences for > this tag combination along with power=* should be changed to use > audible=*. > > The following mistaggings of traffic_signals:sound=* should also be > eliminated manually: sound=* (in the right combination), > crossing:signals:sound=*, crossing:sound=*. > > > See the proposal page for details: > https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/Objects_generating_audible_cues _______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
