Given the number exposed here by Martin, and the fact that there is a few established data consumers, I think that preserving the pump tag as it is now and refine it with another tag would be a good idea indeed. Yves
Le 22 novembre 2020 02:58:07 GMT+01:00, Martin Koppenhoefer <dieterdre...@gmail.com> a écrit : > > >sent from a phone > >> On 22. Nov 2020, at 02:32, François Lacombe <fl.infosrese...@gmail.com> >> wrote: >> >> It's true proposed tagging deprecates the current pump=* definition >> according to rationale and wishes to use the pump word in a more appropriate >> way. > > >this would deprecate around 20k pump values describing a pump type, plus 15k >yes/no. > >Looking at the no-values, 23% are not in combination with man_made >https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/tags/pump=no#combinations >i.e. this is also used on other objects to state buildings there is no pump. >I would also suggest you modify your proposal in a way that it is compatible >with the current use of the pump tag > >Cheers Martin
_______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
