1) both are in use and while level:ref has more uses most of them come from mass edits[1]
2) this edits were intended to document current tagging practice, not to create a proposal 3) addr:floor went through a proposal[2] and I am not going to mark it as deprecated without consultation 4) I am not planning to work on deprecating either one 5) I am not aware about any subtle differences except what was mentioned at wiki page (tagging trash can with level:ref seems reasonable, tagging trash can with addr:floor seems weird, similar with other tags not carrying addresses) 6) If someone wants to make a proposal related to this tags (including deprecations) - feel free, I am not planning to do this [1] note spikes in usage count at https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/keys/level%3Aref#chronology indicating large numbers of tags added in very short time, with barely any use otherwise - typical for imports and mass retaggings [2] https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/addr_keys_(2011-04) Dec 18, 2020, 13:35 by dieterdre...@gmail.com: > Your edit makes sense, at least as a first step, but we should reflect how to > explain why addr:floor is described as an alternative to level:ref, and not > as a "possible tagging mistake". Are there subtle differences? If not, I > would prefer to choose one and discourage the other. 10.000 uses are not > completely ignorable, but they still indicate this is in the beginning, given > that we have millions of POIs. > > Cheers > Martin >
_______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
