I agree with this interpretation. sport=* should always be secondary to some physical feature that is a location in some way related to the sport (where it is played, where you can get lessons, a shop, etc).
On Sun, Dec 20, 2020 at 6:32 PM Martin Koppenhoefer <dieterdre...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > sent from a phone > > On 20. Dec 2020, at 22:45, Warin <61sundow...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Some examples; > > sport bowls A place where you can play lawn bowls/lawn bowling. > > sport kitesurfing To mark a spot for kitesurfing > > sport multi A sports facility that is suitable for more than one > sport > > sport racquet Racquetball facilities, such as racquetball courts > > sport scuba_diving To mark a spot for scuba diving > > sport surfing A spot for surfing. > > > > These do not describe the 'sport'/activity but state it is a > 'place'/'spot' i.e. a physical thing. > > > > these descriptions are misguided and should be fixed. The tag “sport” is > about a sport, it is a property, and unlike the wiki says, its presence > does not even tell in every case that you can exercise the sport at an > object with this tag. E.g. > shop=sports > sport=surfing > > The wiki is explicit: “ A sport should normally also be associated with a > suitable physical feature where it is performed; often this is leisure > <https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:leisure>=pitch > <https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:leisure%3Dpitch> or leisure > <https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:leisure>=trac > <https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:leisure%3Dtrack> > > > Cheers Martin > > _______________________________________________ > Tagging mailing list > Tagging@openstreetmap.org > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging >
_______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
