Term "unisex" is obvious for me (I am not a native English speaker), but in JOSM validator historically has been rule "replace female=yes & male=yes to unisex=yes".
пн, 10 окт. 2022 г., 21:56 martianfreeloader <martianfreeloa...@posteo.net>: > Hi Amanda, > > No. > > What puzzles non-native speakers (including myself) is that English has > a clear distinction between sex and gender (other than, for example, > German). Yet, the term "unisex" (contains the word "sex") is used to > designate a situation in the "gender" category, not sex. > > Can you help? > > > On 10/10/2022 19:37, Amanda McCann wrote: > > On Thu, 06 Oct 2022 20:05 +02:00, Zeke Farwell <ezeki...@gmail.com> > wrote: > >> The proposal currently states: > >>> Meaning of the unisex <https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:unisex>=yes > is currently unclear: > >>> > >>> * gender neutral facility (as the "unisex" term in English); or > >>> * facility that accessible for men and women, either segregated or > not. > >> I do not understand what is unclear. The term unisex is well > >> understood among English speakers to mean "gender neutral". > > > > I'm a native English speaker, and I agree! I also wrote that part of the > wiki (years ago). I think some non-native speakers treated `unisex=yes` as > meaning “gender segregated but male & female are available”, i.e. read that > paragraph as “some OSMers might have been wrong, and we don't know how many > unisex=yes/no tags in OSM were affected by the misunderstanding” > > > > _______________________________________________ > Tagging mailing list > Tagging@openstreetmap.org > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging >
_______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
